What if it doesn't work?

The Republicans in Congress wouldn't approve a bail out for automakers. So Bush and the Democrats in Congress did an end-around and gave up on trying to find fresh money for Detroit. Instead, they filched 14 of the $700 billion that was already approved by Congress to bail out the financial system and directed that to the automakers.

The $14 billion is purportedly being given as secured low interest loans. We are told that the money will be paid back and tax payers may even make a little money off of the deal.

So what happens if the big three automakers take the money and STILL go bankrupt?

Fixing Comments Functionality

New posts should be comment-able now. Bummer that the last few weren't.

To Love the Country or the Countryside

How about this for getting to the root of the problem?

The Chevy Volt (an electric car) is being pushed by General Motors as the first production electric car, to hit the market in 2010. GM unveiled it at a NASCAR event, and they're understandably trying to drum up excitement about the car. But GM has to be careful about pushing the Volt too hard as a patriotic, pro-American car that can help free us from our dependence on foreign oil. While they want to take advantage of the desire by nationalists to see the US become energy independent, they're reluctant to get to stars-and-stripes with the Volt.

Pete Lewis, who works in program operations at GM, puts it this way.

"There is a fear that if we position this as a 'pro-American' car, it will upset some of the environmentally conscious crowd, and we want it to be embraced by everyone."

Mr. Lewis is justified in his concern about offending the green-ers by becoming too pro-American, but I find it tremendously sad.

The most "green" or "environmentally conscious" among us are, by definition, the most anti-American. Take a look at Hollywood, PETA, Greenpeace, the Sierra Club (sorry Steven), and any other such organization if you disagree with me.

And the flag-waving, America-loving nationalists among us tend to be decidedly less concerned about environmental issues. Take a look at any NASCAR event across the country for further proof.

How has it come to this? How have we gotten to the point where, to care about our environment, we must hate our country?

Hubble Repair?

Over the last several years we've seen article after article about how the Hubble space telescope is a dinosaur and not worth repairing. Space geeks get all up in arms when talk of giving up on Hubble surfaces, and NASA officials always calmly explain why Hubble isn't worth maintaining at this point.

Each time this happens, I check Hubble off in my mind as a done deal. It's over. No longer being maintained. Fine.

And then I see stories like this. . . about a planned shuttle mission to repair the Hubble telescope.
I don't get it.

Is the United States Behind. . . or Ahead?

With Barack Obama as the Democratic candidate for president, critics of the United States talk about how our country might just finally catch up with the rest of the civilized world and elect a non-white president.  The implication, of course, is that the rest of the world cleared this discriminatory hurdle decades ago.  

I got to wondering, though. . . has the United Kingdom ever elected a non-white Prime Minister?   I don't think so. And it goes without saying that they've never had a black king or queen.

Have the Germans ever elected a non-white Chancellor?  I'm pretty sure they haven't.  How about Italy?  Or Spain?  

For that matter, how about Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, or Sweden?  Have any of these countries ever had a black national leader?  

I'm not an expert on the history of any of these countries, certainly; to tell you the truth I can't even name the current leader of half of them.  I guess there may be one in there that has elected a black person as their national leader at some point, but I can't think of one off hand. 

Do we still have discriminatory hurdles to conquer here in the United States?  Sure.  But is the US really so far behind on this particular issue?  Or might it just be out in front on this one?

I possess a neat antique brass spyglass of some sort, and I've always wondered about its origins. It's a collapsable (telescoping) spyglass like you'd see a 19th century ship's captain using to scout the horizon. It is 48" long when fully extended. Engraved on the section near the eye piece is:



Docteur Arthur Chevalier
158 Palais Royal
Paris

I looked the dude up and found that Chevalier's company mostly made microscopes and other scientific instruments back in the second half of the 19th century. I couldn't find any real references to telescopes of this nature, so I contacted the Oris group, a trio of scientific instrument enthusiasts in Italy who specialize in the research and identification of antiques such as mine. They can be found at http://www.bononiaemicroscope.it/

They’ve been very helpful to me so far, expressing interest in my spyglass turning me on to this Chevalier catalog from the mid 1800s.

http://www.sil.si.edu/digitalcollections/trade-literature/scientific-instruments/files/51671/

I've sent the Oris Group some pics of my telescope and hope to hear back from them soon. I'll keep y'all posted on what (if anything) I find out.

Reality Check

My apologies for the caesura in my blog postings. Work and school conspired to wear me out there for a while, and I reverted to bad habits, namely emailing about blog-ish stuff to a core group of friends instead of blogging about those things here.

I hope to be back on track now, for better or for worse.